COVID-19: Available for in-person or zoom client meetings
LEARN MOREFREE CONSULTATION: 817-617-7797
After an auto accident in Fort Worth, determining who caused the crash is about more than deciding who should receive the blame. Fault can directly affect whether an injured person can recover compensation and how much they may receive.
Texas uses a system known as proportionate responsibility to address accidents in which more than one person shares fault. For people injured in Fort Worth car and truck accidents, understanding this rule can be important when an insurance company claims they contributed to the collision.
Proportionate responsibility is the system Texas uses to allocate fault when multiple parties may have contributed to an accident. Instead of requiring one person to be completely responsible, each party can be assigned a percentage of responsibility based on their role in causing the crash.
Under Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code Chapter 33, an injured person generally may recover damages when their percentage of responsibility is 50% or less. However, their compensation is reduced according to their percentage of fault.
If their responsibility is greater than 50%, they generally cannot recover damages under the proportionate responsibility statute.
For example, suppose a Fort Worth driver suffers $100,000 in damages after a collision but is found 20% responsible for the accident. Their recoverable damages could be reduced by 20%, leaving $80,000.
This makes the percentage of fault assigned after a Fort Worth auto accident especially important.
There is no automatic formula for assigning percentages of responsibility. The circumstances surrounding the Fort Worth accident and the available evidence must be examined.
Evidence that may help establish fault includes:
Traffic violations can also play an important role. Speeding, distracted driving, following too closely, running a red light, and making an unsafe lane change are just some behaviors that could contribute to an accident.
Our Fort Worth car accident attorneys can investigate the circumstances of a collision and evaluate evidence relevant to determining responsibility.
Insurance companies have a financial reason to pay as little as reasonably possible on claims. One way an insurer may dispute a Fort Worth car accident claim is by arguing that the injured person shares responsibility for what happened.
Consider a crash in which another motorist turns in front of a driver at a Fort Worth intersection. The other driver's insurer might acknowledge that its insured made an unsafe turn but argue that the injured driver was speeding and therefore could have avoided the collision.
If the injured driver is eventually assigned part of the responsibility, their recovery could be reduced.
This is why seemingly minor details about a Fort Worth collision can become important. Statements made after the accident, photographs, witness accounts, vehicle data, and other evidence can influence how responsibility is evaluated.
Proportionate responsibility becomes even more significant when a Fort Worth accident involves several vehicles.
Suppose three drivers are involved in a chain-reaction collision. An investigation could conclude that one driver was 60% responsible, another was 25% responsible, and the injured driver was 15% responsible.
The injured driver's damages would generally be reduced by their 15% share of responsibility.
Multi-vehicle accidents can become particularly complicated because different drivers and insurance companies may offer conflicting explanations of how the collision occurred. Determining who initiated the sequence of events and which actions contributed to the resulting injuries can require a detailed investigation.
The same basic concept can apply when a commercial truck is involved, but determining responsibility may be considerably more complicated.
A Fort Worth truck accident could potentially involve the conduct of:
For example, a truck driver may have been following too closely while another driver made an unsafe lane change immediately before a collision. Evidence may show that both actions contributed to the accident.
Commercial truck cases may also involve records that are not typically relevant to an ordinary passenger vehicle collision, including driver logs, vehicle inspection records, maintenance documents, electronic logging device information, and company safety records.
Our Fort Worth truck accident lawyers can examine these issues when determining which parties may share responsibility for a serious commercial vehicle crash.
An insurance adjuster may assign fault while evaluating a claim, but the insurer's position does not necessarily determine the final legal outcome.
An insurance company may argue that a Fort Worth accident victim was driving too fast, failed to react soon enough, was distracted, or otherwise contributed to the crash. Those allegations should be evaluated against the actual evidence.
This is one reason accident victims should be careful when discussing a collision with another driver's insurance company. A casual statement can potentially be interpreted in a way that supports an argument for shared responsibility.
When a lawsuit is filed and the parties continue to dispute fault, responsibility may ultimately become an issue for a judge or jury to decide based on the evidence presented.
Texas's proportionate responsibility system is sometimes described as a modified comparative fault rule. The key dividing line is whether the claimant's responsibility exceeds 50%.
A person who is found 10%, 25%, or even 50% responsible may still potentially recover damages, although the award is reduced by that percentage. Once the person's responsibility reaches 51%, however, Texas law generally prevents that person from recovering damages under this system.
That single percentage point can therefore have major financial consequences in a serious Fort Worth auto accident case.
It also illustrates why disputes over fault should not be dismissed simply because the other driver's insurer claims an accident victim contributed to the crash.
Being accused of contributing to an accident does not necessarily mean the insurance company's assessment is correct.
If fault is disputed, preserving evidence can be particularly important. After a Fort Worth collision, accident victims should consider keeping photographs, medical documents, repair records, insurance correspondence, and any other information connected to the crash.
It can also be important to investigate promptly. Video may be overwritten, physical evidence can disappear, and witnesses may become more difficult to locate as time passes.
An attorney can review the circumstances of the accident, identify evidence bearing on responsibility, and address allegations that could reduce the value of the claim.
Proportionate responsibility can have a significant effect on the outcome of a Texas auto accident case, especially when an insurance company argues that multiple people contributed to the collision. Understanding how fault is assigned can help injured people make informed decisions about protecting their rights.
If you are dealing with injuries after a Fort Worth auto accident, our attorneys are here to help. Call us today or connect with us online to schedule a consultation.
